It has surprised me how many Republicans have come out to sing the praises of Hillary Clinton and hailed her as a great choice for the new Secretary of State. I always thought she was unpopular in the Republican camp. But even Arnold Schwarzenegger who did not think Obama had the quads to be President, sees this as a good move, apparently seeing
On reflection, I guess it makes some sense. Going back to the love fest primary debates, where Obama and Clinton seemed to agree on most everything, it was foreign policy outside of
During the primary debates, Obama said he would meet with "rogue state leaders." He said the notion that not talking to countries is punishment to them – "which has been the guiding diplomatic principle of this administration – is ridiculous." While Hillary Clinton said she would not meet directly with those leaders.
And she opposes lifting the ridiculous embargo on Cuba.
Hillary Clinton does have a great deal of experience and understanding and would certainly be formidable negotiator. She is tough, but tough to a point where she already knows where she stands. More to the point, others outside the
Hillary Clinton is tremendously popular among my Chinese friends in the
In April this year,
I applaud Obama's swell heart and wise actions to "ally the majority, including even those who were against you before" (as Chairman Mao once taught us :-)). And I think that
So Hillary, should you chance to read this, please say NO to being Secretary of State. You can serve
4 comments:
The problem is, as a junior Senator, Clinton has relatively little institutional power in the Senate (though I gather Kennedy is trying to sweeten the deal for her to remain by offering her a subcommittee post that tangentially deals with healthcare).
I actually think Clinton is a good pick for SoS, for several reasons. Mainly, the domestic economy is in such crisis that Obama will not have time to travel abroad very much. Clinton is someone with star power almost equal to his and who is still tremendously popular around world. It sends a signal that the US under an Obama administration is serious about repairing relationships with other nations.
As for foreign policy differences between Obama and Clinton, they are not nearly as great as what's been advertised, and she would be carrying out his foreign policy in any case.
I also think that so much of the economic struggle is wrapped up in the global economy that she will have a voice on these issues as well.
My two cents.
Hi Lisa, nice to see you here. You make good points. However, what I worry is that Clinton's hard line attitude would impede Obama's inclusive foreign policy. On the other hand, she could turn the Health and Human Services into something really important, if she wouldn't be offended by such an offer.
Another way to look at it is that her policies as Secretary of State would be strongly influenced by his policies, and by the new "moral majority" of people who really want to do the right thing.
I hope you are right, Jerry, but she could convince him on things as well. She is a firm and persuasive lady. :-)
Post a Comment